Mississippi vs Arkansas Solar Incentives: Which State Gets the Better Deal?
Side-by-side comparison of Mississippi and Arkansas solar incentive programs in 2026: state tax credits, net metering rules, exemptions, payback period, and projected 25-year savings.
| Metric | MS · Mississippi | AR · Arkansas |
|---|---|---|
| Avg Monthly Bill | $185 | $155 |
| Peak Sun Hours / Day | 4.9 | 5 ◆ |
| Avg $/Watt Installed | $3.05 | $2.95 ◆ |
| State Tax Credit | None | None |
| Net Metering | None | retail |
| SREC Market | No | No |
| Property Tax Exempt | No | No |
| Sales Tax Exempt | No | No |
| Avg Payback (yrs) | 10.1 | 9.1 ◆ |
| Avg 25-Year Savings | $27,100 | $30,200 ◆ |
State Tax Credit Comparison
Mississippi offers no state income tax credit. Arkansas offers no state income tax credit.
Net Metering Policies
Mississippi: no statewide net metering mandate. Arkansas: retail rate net metering active.
Net metering is often the most economically significant solar policy because it determines how excess production is valued. Retail-rate states (where you receive full retail price for exported energy) have substantially better solar economics than avoided-cost or no-net-metering states.
Average 25-Year Savings
Mississippi: $27,100 over 25 years (avg payback 10.1 yrs). Arkansas: $30,200 over 25 years (avg payback 9.1 yrs).
Verdict: Which State Wins on Solar?
Arkansas delivers stronger lifetime solar economics than Mississippi due to higher solar irradiance.
Note: state averages mask significant within-state variation. Your specific utility, roof orientation, and household electricity profile drive your actual numbers — use the calculator to model your home directly.